A qualitative evaluation of the oncologists', neurologists', and pain specialists' views on the management and care of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: In treating cancer, different chemotherapy regimens cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Despite recent international guidelines, a gold standard for diagnosis, treatment, and care is lacking. To identify the current clinical practice and the physicians' point of view and ideas for improvement, we evaluated CIPN care by interviewing different specialists involved. METHODS: We performed semi-structured, audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews with a purposive sample of oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists involved in CIPN patients' care. Data is analyzed by a constant comparative method for content analysis, using ATLAS.ti software. Codes, categories, and themes are extracted, generating common denominators and conclusions. RESULTS: With oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists, nine, nine, and eight interviews were taken respectively (including three, two, and two interviews after thematic saturation occurred). While useful preventive measures and predictors are lacking, patient education (e.g., on symptoms and timely reporting) is deemed pivotal, as is low-threshold screening (e.g., anamnesis and questionnaires). Diagnosis focusses on a temporal relationship to chemotherapy, with adjuvant testing (e.g., EMG) used in severe or atypical cases. Symptomatic antineuropathic and topical medication are often prescribed, but personalized and multidimensional care based on individual symptoms and preferences is highly valued. The limited efficacy of existing treatments, and the lack of standardized protocols, interdisciplinary coordination, and awareness among healthcare providers pose significant challenges. CONCLUSION: Besides the obvious need for better therapeutic options, and multidisciplinary exploration of patients' perspectives, a structured and collaborative approach towards diagnosis, treatment, referral, and follow-up, nurtured by improving knowledge and use of existing CIPN guidelines, could enhance care.

Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care.

BACKGROUND: While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pain and to compare this with current practice and 'traditional' prediction modeling. METHODS: Prognostic cohort-study in primary care physiotherapy. Patients (n = 247) with acute low back pain (≤ one month) consulting physiotherapists were included. Candidate predictors were assessed by questionnaire at baseline and (to capture early recovery) after one and two weeks. Primary outcome was non-recovery after three months, defined as at least mild pain (Numeric Rating Scale > 2/10). Machine learning models to predict non-recovery were developed and internally validated, and compared with two current practices in physiotherapy (STarT Back tool and physiotherapists' expectation) and 'traditional' logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of the participants did not recover at three months. The best performing machine learning model showed acceptable predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.66). Although this was no better than a'traditional' logistic regression model, it outperformed current practice. CONCLUSIONS: We developed two prognostic models containing partially different predictors, with acceptable performance for predicting (non-)recovery in patients with acute LBP, which was better than current practice. Our prognostic models have the potential of integration in a clinical decision support system to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment of acute low back pain, but needs external validation first.

Specialist palliative care teams and characteristics related to referral rate: a national cross-sectional survey among hospitals in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care teams (SPCTs) in hospitals improve quality of life and satisfaction with care for patients with advanced disease. However, referrals to SPCTs are often limited. To identify areas for improvement of SPCTs' service penetration, we explored the characteristics and level of integration of palliative care programmes and SPCTs in Dutch hospitals and we assessed the relation between these characteristics and specialist palliative care referral rates. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey conducted among hospitals in the Netherlands from March through May 2018. For this survey, a previously developed online questionnaire, containing 6 consensus-based integration indicators, was sent to palliative care programme leaders in all 78 hospitals. For referral rate we calculated the number of annual inpatient referrals to the SPCT as a percentage of the number of total annual hospital admissions. Referral rate was dichotomized into high (≥ third quartile) and low (< third quartile). Characteristics of SPCTs with high and low referral rate were compared using univariate analyses. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: In total, 63 hospitals (81%) participated in the survey, of which 62 had an operational SPCT. The palliative care programmes of these hospitals consisted of inpatient consultation services (94%), interdisciplinary staffing (61%), outpatient clinics (45%), dedicated acute care beds (21%) and community-based palliative care (27%). The median referral rate was 0.56% (IQR 0.23-1.0%), ranging from 0 to 3.7%. Comparing SPCTs with high referral rate (≥1%, n = 17) and low referral rate (< 1%, n = 45) showed significant differences for SPCTs' years of existence, staffing, their level of education, participation in other departments' team meetings, provision of education and conducting research. With regard to integration, significant differences were found for the presence of outpatient clinics and timing of referrals. CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, palliative care programmes and specialist palliative care teams in hospitals vary in their level of integration and development, with more mature teams showing higher referral rates. Appropriate staffing, dedicated outpatient clinics, education and research appear means to improve service penetration and timing of referral for patients with advanced diseases.

Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of palliative patients is challenging. The Surprise Question (SQ1; Would I be surprised if this patient were to die within 12 months?) is widely used to identify palliative patients. However, its predictive value is low. Therefore, we added a second question (SQ2) to SQ1: 'Would I be surprised if this patient is still alive after 12 months?' We studied the accuracy of this double surprise question (DSQ) in a general practice. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study with retrospective medical record review in a general practice in the eastern part of the Netherlands. Two general practitioners (GPs) answered both questions for all 292 patients aged ≥75 years (mean age 84 years). Primary outcome was 1-year death, secondary outcomes were aspects of palliative care. RESULTS: SQ1 was answered with 'no' for 161/292 patients. Of these, SQ2 was answered with 'yes' in 22 patients. Within 12 months 26 patients died, of whom 24 had been identified with SQ1 (sensitivity: 92%, specificity: 49%). Ten of them were also identified with SQ2 (sensitivity: 42%, specificity: 91%). The latter group had more contacts with their GP and more palliative care aspects were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The DSQ appears a feasible and easy applicable screening tool in general practice. It is highly effective in predicting patients in high need for palliative care and using it helps to discriminate between patients with different life expectancies and palliative care needs. Further research is necessary to confirm the findings of this study.

Feasibility and validity of a tool for identification of people with intellectual disabilities in need of palliative care (PALLI).

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a specific tool that supports healthcare professionals in timely identifying people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in need of palliative care. Therefore, we developed PALLI: a tool for screening deteriorating health, indicative of a limited life expectancy. AIMS: We evaluated feasibility, construct validity and predictive validity of PALLI. METHODS: 190 people with ID likely to be in need of palliative care were included. Physicians and daily care professionals (DCPs) completed PALLI and provided information on health outcomes at baseline, after 5-6 months and after 10-12 months. Linear Mixed Models and Generalized Linear Mixed Models were used to test validity. RESULTS: Feasibility was adequate: physicians and DCPs were able to answer most items with 'yes' or 'no' and within a short amount of time. Construct validity was promising: a higher PALLI score at baseline was related to a higher level of decline in health, a higher symptom burden, a lower quality of life and more ADL-dependency at baseline. Predictive validity: only a higher physician-reported PALLI score at baseline significantly increased risk of death within 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: PALLI shows promising feasibility and validity and has potential as a tool for timely identifying people with ID who may benefit from palliative care.

The in vitro mechanisms and in vivo efficacy of intravenous lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain.

INTRODUCTION: The neuroinflammatory response plays a key role in several pain syndromes. Intravenous (iv) lidocaine is beneficial in acute and chronic pain. This review delineates the current literature concerning in vitro mechanisms and in vivo efficacy of iv lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in acute and chronic pain. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: We searched PUBMED and the Cochrane Library for in vitro and in vivo studies from July 1975 to August 2014. In vitro articles providing an explanation for the mechanisms of action of lidocaine on the neuroinflammatory response in pain were included. Animal or clinical studies were included concerning iv lidocaine for acute or chronic pain or during inflammation. RESULTS: Eighty-eight articles regarding iv lidocaine were included: 36 in vitro studies evaluating the effect on ion channels and receptors; 31 animal studies concerning acute and chronic pain and inflammatory models; 21 clinical studies concerning acute and chronic pain. Low-dose lidocaine inhibits in vitro voltage-gated sodium channels, the glycinergic system, some potassium channels and Gαq-coupled protein receptors. Higher lidocaine concentrations block potassium and calcium channels, and NMDA receptors. Animal studies demonstrate lidocaine to have analgesic effects in acute and neuropathic pain syndromes and anti-inflammatory effects early in the inflammatory response. Clinical studies demonstrate lidocaine to have advantage in abdominal surgery and in some neuropathic pain syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine has analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic properties mediated by an inhibitory effect on ion channels and receptors. It attenuates the neuroinflammatory response in perioperative pain and chronic neuropathic pain.

Resveratrol attenuates NF-κB-binding activity but not cytokine production in mechanically ventilated mice.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) can result in inflammation and subsequent lung injury. Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 and NF-κB are proposed to play a crucial role in the MV-induced inflammatory response. Resveratrol (RVT) exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo supposedly by interfering with TLR4 signaling and NF-κB. In the present study, we investigated the role of RVT in MV-induced inflammation in mice. METHODS: RVT (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg) or vehicle was intraperitoneally administered 1 h before start of MV (4 h, tidal volume 8 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 1,5 cmH2 O and FiO2 0.4). Blood and lungs were harvested for cytokine analysis. DNA binding activity of transcription factor NF-κB was measured in lung homogenates. RESULTS: MV resulted in elevated pulmonary concentrations of IL-1ß, IL-6, keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) and NF-κB DNA-binding activity. RVT at 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg reduced NF-κB's DNA-binding activity following MV compared with ventilated controls. However, no differences in cytokine release were found between RVT-treated and control ventilated mice. Similarly, in plasma, MV resulted in elevated concentrations of TNF-α, KC and IL-6, but RVT did not affect cytokine levels. CONCLUSIONS: RVT abrogates the MV-induced increase in pulmonary NF-κB activity but does not attenuate cytokine levels. This implies a less prominent role for NF-κB in MV-induced inflammation than previously assumed.

A phase II study of cediranib as palliative treatment in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites or pleural effusion.

Malignant ascites and pleural effusion are challenging clinical problems, with a major impact on quality of life. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to assess the palliative value of cediranib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI). After a baseline paracentesis or thoracentesis (on day 0), patients with symptomatic malignant ascites and/or pleural effusion were randomized between immediate treatment with cediranib (Immediate Cediranib) or delayed treatment with cediranib (Delayed Cediranib) on day 29, or after a new puncture was needed. The primary objective of the study was the puncture-free survival, defined as the time from study start (day 1) to the first need for paracentesis or thoracentesis, or time to death, whichever event occurred first. Twelve patients were enrolled. The median puncture-free survival was 45 days (range 10-368) in the Immediate Cediranib patients and 7 days (range 4-13) in the Delayed Cediranib patients (P = 0.011). The change in puncture-free interval (the puncture-free survival after study start minus the puncture-free interval before study start) increased with a median of 31 days in the Immediate Cediranib patients and shortened with a median of 3 days in the Delayed Cediranib patients (P = 0.015). The most common adverse events were fatigue and anorexia. In conclusion, cediranib increased the puncture-free survival and puncture-free interval with an acceptable toxicity profile. This is the first study in which an oral VEGFR TKI showed beneficial palliative effects in patients with malignant effusions.

Opioid rotation in the management of chronic pain: where is the evidence?

The management of chronic pain remains a challenge because of its complexity and unpredictable response to pharmacological treatment. In addition, accurate pain management may be hindered by the prejudice of physicians and patients that strong opioids, classified as step 3 medications in the World Health Organization ladder for cancer pain management, are reserved for the end stage of life. Recent information indicates the potential value of strong opioids in the treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain. There are, up until now, insufficient data to provide indications about which opioid to use to initiate treatment or the dose to be used for any specific pain syndrome. The strong inter-patient variability in opioid receptor response and in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of strong opioids justifies an individual selection of the appropriate opioid and stepwise dose titration. Clinical experience shows that switching from one opioid to another may optimize pain control while maintaining an acceptable side effect profile or even improving the side effects. This treatment strategy, described as opioid rotation or switch, requires a dose calculation for the newly started opioid. Currently, conversion tables and equianalgesic doses are available. However, those recommendations are often based on data derived from studies designed to evaluate acute pain relief, and sometimes on single dose studies, which reduces this information to the level of an indication. In daily practice, the clinician needs to titrate the optimal dose during the opioid rotation from a reduced calculated dose, based on the clinical response of the patient. Further research and studies are needed to optimize the equianalgesic dosing tables.

Inappropriateness of using opioids for end-stage palliative sedation: a Dutch study.

To be able to distinguish end-stage palliative sedation from euthanasia without having to refer to intentions that are difficult to verify, physicians must be able to manage palliative sedation appropriately (i.e., see that death is not hastened as a result of disproportionate medication). In the present study, we assessed whether or not this requirement is met in the Netherlands. We sent a retrospective questionnaire to 1,464 medical specialists, general practitioners, and nursing home physicians in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we held two sets of 20 and 22 semi-structured in-depth interviews with general practitioners, internists, lung specialists, and nursing home physicians. Although most guidelines discourage the administration of opioids alone for purposes of palliative sedation, opioids alone were administered for 22% of all the patients reported upon. Those physicians who were more experienced, general practitioners, and physicians who had consulted a palliative care expert administered only opioids significantly less often than the other physicians. The interviewees reported difficulties in assessing the appropriateness of medication, feeling uncertain about the pharmacokinetics of drugs used in moribund patients. Given that no more than 2% of the respondents perceived palliative sedation to be used as a form of euthanasia and that the use of opioids alone was not associated with shorter survival rates, the inappropriate use of opioids can only be attributed to a lack of knowledge or skill and/or a tradition of alleviating refractory dyspnoea with the use of opioids and not as an intentional means of hastening death.

The clinical challenge of chronic neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND: The clinician often faces the problem that certain types of chronic pains remain refractory to the commonly used analgesic treatment options. Neuropathic pain, which is defined as pain caused by direct nerve lesions, may have different causes and a variety of clinical presentations. A correct management of chronic neuropathic pain requires a thorough understanding of the potential causes, the diagnosis and the pathophysiological mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review article is to provide the reader with the latest insights in the diagnostic work-out and the clinical presentation of neuropathic pain. Additionally, the possible pathophysiological changes induced by nerve lesions are explained. METHODS: An extensive literature review was performed using Pubmed citations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This article, which is based on extensive literature review, aims at providing a concise review of the current knowledge regarding aetiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of neuropathic pain.